Occupational asthma, eosinophil and skin prick tests and serum total IgE values of the workers in a plant manufacturing rose oil.

This study was aimed to determine the rate of occupational asthma (OA) in workers at a rose extracting plant. Specific clinical tests of 52 workers, randomly chosen from four local rose extracting plants, were statistically compared with the test results of 30 local control subjects of similar age and sex as the plant workers, but who had never worked in such a plant. There were no significant differences in pulmonary function tests (FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, PEFR) between the control and test groups. Significantly higher serum total IgE values (p < 0.0001) were observed for the test subjects (239.08+/-240 IU/ml) compared to the control subjects (81.33+/-61.45 IU/ml). There were also significant differences (p < 0.0001) in the number of eosinophils between the control and test groups, with corresponding mean values of 2.28+/-2.75% and 0.73+/-1.72%, respectively. A specifically prepared skin prick test using a rose allergen (Rosa domescena) was positive for 53.84% in the test subjects whereas only 5.33% positive test results were seen in the control group. We have demonstrated the involvement of Rosa domescena pollen in occupational allergy, through IgE-mediated hypersensitivity. It was concluded that the workers of a rose oil extracting plant are more susceptible to the rose pollens.

Allergic rhinitis in Rosa domescena cultivators: a novel type of occupational allergy?

After the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis due to Rosa domescena was suspected in one subject with skin prick and nasal provocation tests, we recruited all other workers employed in rose cultivation in Yakaören village, Isparta. From May 2000 to July 2000 (exposure period 'time of rose handling'), we studied 600 individuals employed in rose cultivation. A questionnaire was administered by a physician, and skin testing was done by a nurse on 75 individuals suffering from asthma and/or rhinitis. Sera from these 75 subjects were available for immunologic testing. The diagnosis of atopy against rose was based on the presence of work-related symptoms, positive skin prick test (SPT) with rose extracts, and positive RAST. While no subject reported asthmatic symptoms, twenty of them reported either rhino-conjunctivitis, rhinitis or both on exposure to Rosa domescena. Fourteen of these subjects had increased specific IgE levels to Rosa domescena. Eleven (78.5%) also had a positive skin reaction to Rosa domescena. Out of the six negative sera with normal specific IgE levels to rose, only two (33.3%) had positive skin reactivity. No subject had significant daily peak expiratoy flow rate (PEFR) variations. We conclude that exposure to Rosa domescena may represent a risk for allergic rhinitis. The possibility of an occupational rose allergy should therefore be taken into consideration in the subjects working in rose cultivation.